Comments on: National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy (Video, Photos)

By: The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement. | NO LIES RADIO

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:00:38 +0000

[...] “9/11: Science and Conspiracy”, (http://www.shallownation.com/2009/08/31/national-geographic-9-11-science-and-conspiracy-video-photos…). National Geographic Channel is a joint venture of National Geographic Television & Film and [...]

By: Don

Don — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:42:47 +0000

Hey Neil Crouse! there is only one side, the truth! That’s the problem with science for your “theory” I guess, when you test something instead of spit out BS, you find out the truth. I guess that you’ll also tell me the world’s only 3,000 years old, we never landed on the moon, there were no dinosaurs, and don’t forget that the world is run by a super secret organization of super mason apes. Have fun being a idiot.
Nobody thinks you’re intelligent because you read on the internet that the 9/11 attacks were a conspiracy, if you believe everything you see on the internet, then you deserve it.
I heard you can buy a doctorate from a phony college on the internet too. You should do that as well, then you can add fake Dr. to fake scientist, architectural engineer, explosives expert, CSI and obviously you have to be tight with a couple big wigs on the hill. Of course your right, sorry to doubt you.

By: National Geographic Unlikely Animal Friends (Video, Photos) | Shallow Nation

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:34:08 +0000

[...] National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy (Video, Photos) [...]

By: Neil Crouse

Neil Crouse — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:11:58 +0000

Wow! I must say that I am very disappointed with just how one sided some of the information that is being used to “scientificatly prove” the official version of the horrible events of September 11, 2001. It’s one thing to believe your side of an argument and want to support it with whatever tools are at your disposal, but it was so blatantly obvious and one sided that I felt as if anyone who disagreed with the official version was unintelligent and somehow less than. It certainly was not an open-minded unbiased report and unfortunately it was not the first time that a report on 9/11 from the Discovery Channel has been presented in this manner. Not very professional in my opinion and the end result is an awful lot of mistrust between the press and the public that may never heal.
All I want is an open, honest investigation and an explanation of the nano-thermite would be a nice bonus.

By: National Geographic E-Mail Order Bride (Video, Photos) | Shallow Nation

National Geographic E-Mail Order Bride (Video, Photos) | Shallow Nation — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:31:02 +0000

[...] National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy (Video, Photos) [...]

By: Pat

Pat — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:14:05 +0000

9-11Science and Conspiracy certainly leaned toward supporting the “official” story of 911. And that doesn’t surprise me. If it is true that 33% of Americans are suspicious of what we have been sold in regards to the event it behooves supportive media to try and erase so much doubt. Once you get past the horrible thought that some of our leadership knew 9/11 would happen you have to ask why. Then came the phony war in Irac and the heavy fear mongering in the homeland. Pathetic how ex-VP Cheney keeps bragging about how he and co. kept us safe SINCE 9/11 and never once (to my recollection) expressed any regret that he wasn’t able to act on the intelligence he had regarding an impending attack using aircraft flying into buildings. Hell won’t be hot enough if it finally comes out the he was involved in America’s worst attack.