National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy (Video, Photos)

National Geographic 9-11 Science And Conspiracy

Here are National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy video and photos. The documentary, will premiere on NGC on Monday, August 31, 2009 at 9pm ET in advance of the eighth anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

The documentary, National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy sets out to conduct a forensic investigation designed to test various tenets of some common 9-11 conspiracy theories. What caused the collapse of the Twin Towers? Was it from the fires, or were explosives placed inside the buildings, causing them to implode? Did a missile, rather than a commercial airline jet strike the Pentagon?

Article continues below.

With the use of high-tech forensic experiments, eyewitness footage, CGI re-creations, and an in-depth analysis by experts and theorists on all sides of the story, the documentary attempts to examine both alleged conspiracies and available evidence.

See photos and video below.

Top Photo: Hijacked United Airlines Flight 175 from Boston crashes into the south tower of the World Trade Center and explodes at 9:03 a.m. on September 11, 2001 in New York City. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

National Geographic 9-11 Science And Conspiracy

Socorro, New Mexico: At the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center in New Mexico, experts use high speed track sled for the testing of war heads, penetrators, and shape changes. (Photo Credit: Peter Hankoff)

National Geographic 9-11 Science And Conspiracy

Socorro, New Mexico: At the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center in New Mexico, experts conduct a fire test with a steel beam. (Photo Credit: Peter Hankoff)

Video “9-11 Impact Anatomy” – Conspiracy theorists say jet fuel fires couldn’t have brought down the towers — but a simulation of the impact proves otherwise. Link: National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy Video

Video “Explosive Claims” – Could the towers have been brought down by controlled demolition? Blasting a college dorm helps us answer that question. Video Link

Video “An Elaborate 9-11 Plan” – One theory suggests rogue planes carrying explosives assumed the flight paths of the real ones. Could such a complex plan work? Video Link

Photos and video courtesy of National Geographic

Related posts:

National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy (Video, Photos)


Sharing is caring!


10 Responses to National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy (Video, Photos)

  1. Pat September 2, 2009 at 1:14 pm #

    9-11Science and Conspiracy certainly leaned toward supporting the “official” story of 911. And that doesn’t surprise me. If it is true that 33% of Americans are suspicious of what we have been sold in regards to the event it behooves supportive media to try and erase so much doubt. Once you get past the horrible thought that some of our leadership knew 9/11 would happen you have to ask why. Then came the phony war in Irac and the heavy fear mongering in the homeland. Pathetic how ex-VP Cheney keeps bragging about how he and co. kept us safe SINCE 9/11 and never once (to my recollection) expressed any regret that he wasn’t able to act on the intelligence he had regarding an impending attack using aircraft flying into buildings. Hell won’t be hot enough if it finally comes out the he was involved in America’s worst attack.

  2. Neil Crouse September 11, 2009 at 3:11 pm #

    Wow! I must say that I am very disappointed with just how one sided some of the information that is being used to “scientificatly prove” the official version of the horrible events of September 11, 2001. It’s one thing to believe your side of an argument and want to support it with whatever tools are at your disposal, but it was so blatantly obvious and one sided that I felt as if anyone who disagreed with the official version was unintelligent and somehow less than. It certainly was not an open-minded unbiased report and unfortunately it was not the first time that a report on 9/11 from the Discovery Channel has been presented in this manner. Not very professional in my opinion and the end result is an awful lot of mistrust between the press and the public that may never heal.
    All I want is an open, honest investigation and an explanation of the nano-thermite would be a nice bonus.

  3. Don January 21, 2010 at 3:42 pm #

    Hey Neil Crouse! there is only one side, the truth! That’s the problem with science for your “theory” I guess, when you test something instead of spit out BS, you find out the truth. I guess that you’ll also tell me the world’s only 3,000 years old, we never landed on the moon, there were no dinosaurs, and don’t forget that the world is run by a super secret organization of super mason apes. Have fun being a idiot.
    Nobody thinks you’re intelligent because you read on the internet that the 9/11 attacks were a conspiracy, if you believe everything you see on the internet, then you deserve it.
    I heard you can buy a doctorate from a phony college on the internet too. You should do that as well, then you can add fake Dr. to fake scientist, architectural engineer, explosives expert, CSI and obviously you have to be tight with a couple big wigs on the hill. Of course your right, sorry to doubt you.

  4. MCAustinSr December 14, 2010 at 6:08 pm #

    Neil Crouse: One sided??? Did you not watch the program and see the “Truthers” gathered at the table and given every opportunity to discredit the scientific findings? Did you not listen to what they had to say as their proof and then watch it being thrown out by independent organizations who scientifically proved them wrong?
    33% of the people are said to believe the govt had something to do with this and you think that means there must be some merit to what they think because there are so many. Did you consider that people were tired of Bush and wanted “change”? 66% believe it was a mistake putting Obama in office. Does that mean we should recall him? Works for me, but that’s beside the point. What the real point is, is finding out the state of mind of the people and what the liberal media started throwing out there.
    The FACT is the information conspirators believe in has been debunked by science. Blaming Bush for lack of security is ridiculous considering Clinton was the first to know about it. Are you going to blame him too? If not, why not? Neither President had enough information to stop what took place. After seeing the scientific evidence, f you really believe that one of our Presidents allowed this to happen, then you are far too gullible to be commenting on politics.
    Plain and simple, we were attacked by Muslim extremists. Instead of patting down old ladies and children, we should be profiling like Israel does, who hasn’t had a bomb or hijacking in over 30 years. Stop worrying about hurting someone’s little feelings and make it safe without doing stupid things, like molesting people!
    9/11 happened because of Muslim extremists. Do your own research and stop believing the first you hear.

  5. Thomas Malone March 17, 2011 at 5:24 am #

    “Was it from the fires, or were explosives placed inside the buildings, causing them to implode?”

    Doesn’t anyone find it strange that it is always only these two general causes for the “collapse” of the towers to be given?

    What if empirical evidence shows you without fail that neither is correct? Then what are you going to think?

    There is only one person who has already carried out a complete and thorough study of the actual evidence and has the courage to talk about and indeed publish a university text book style book that goes into minute detail concerning the WHAT of what happened that tragic day.
    That person is Dr. Judy Wood.


  1. National Geographic E-Mail Order Bride (Video, Photos) | Shallow Nation - September 7, 2009

    […] National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy (Video, Photos) […]

  2. National Geographic Unlikely Animal Friends (Video, Photos) | Shallow Nation - September 24, 2009

    […] National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy (Video, Photos) […]

  3. The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement. | NO LIES RADIO - February 15, 2010

    […] “9/11: Science and Conspiracy”, (…). National Geographic Channel is a joint venture of National Geographic Television & Film and […]

  4. National Geographic: Giuliani’s 9-11 (Video, Photos) | Shallow Nation - August 15, 2010

    […] National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy (Video, Photos) […]

  5. National Geographic: Witness: DC 9-11 (Video, Photos) | Shallow Nation - August 19, 2010

    […] National Geographic 9-11 Science and Conspiracy (Video, Photos) […]

Leave a Reply

wordpress analytics